Renewable
electricity projects in the U.K will compete for £300 million ($484 million) in
subsidy support this autumn, which is an increase of £95 million from the
indicative budget published in July, U.K Energy and
Climate Change Secretary Ed Davey announced on Thursday.
The
U.K has decided to move away from its current Renewables Obligation Certificates
(ROC) scheme for supporting renewable energy projects towards the so-called
Contracts for Difference (CfD) subsidy program.
CfDs,
which will go into effect in April 2015, will pay a variable top-up between the
market price and a fixed price level, known as the "strike price." If the strike
price is lower than the wholesale market price, generators will be asked to
return the difference.
The
policy for establishing a capacity market and the CfD subsidy scheme are the
cornerstone of the U.K. government's effort to reform the electricity markets in
order to drive investment in a new generation of clean, secure electricity
supplies in a cheaper manner than through previous policies.
Increased
budget to be split between different technologies
However,
renewable energy investors should be aware of the U.K government bearing new
gifts. The increased budget will be split between the various renewable energy
technologies bidding for subsidy support.
Thus,
according to Thursday's announcement from the country's Department for Energy
and Climate Change (DECC), established technologies, such as onshore wind and
solar, will compete for up to £65 million in support, while less established
technologies, such as offshore wind and marine, will share in up to £235
million.
Today's
increase in subsidy support for renewable power projects does not constitute a
change in the government's stance towards financing the sector. "The Government
is able to increase the CFD budget because the latest estimates of the overall
costs of other policies, in particular the Renewables Obligation, are lower than
expected," the DECC said.
Therefore,
the projected spend of the budget remains within the Levy Control Framework,
which means total subsidy to the sector is capped.
Conflicting
case?
Commenting
on Thursday's announcement concerning the finalized budget for CfDs, the U.K's
Solar Trade Association
(STA) suggests this is rather a conflicting case.
"DECC
claims it is moving solar out of the Renewables Obligation (RO) two years early
because of pressures on the RO budget, but the announcement today reveals the
cost of the RO had been lower than expected, and DECC's latest figures show
solar power took just 1.3% of the RO budget in 2013/14," STA says.
STA
Chief Executive Paul Barwell said, "Today's decisions represent serious
strategic mistakes in energy policy that are not supported by the facts and fly
in the face of the urgent need for cost-effective action on climate change."
Who
will invest?
Barwell argues that given solar power has gone from near zero contribution at the start of this government to providing 9.4% of renewable power in the second quarter of 2014, removing solar from the Renewables Obligation constitutes an unfair and unjustified discrimination.
Barwell argues that given solar power has gone from near zero contribution at the start of this government to providing 9.4% of renewable power in the second quarter of 2014, removing solar from the Renewables Obligation constitutes an unfair and unjustified discrimination.
The
STA suggests that plenty of developers "have already decided that the financial risk due to the 'cliff edge' of zero ROCs from
April is far too high" and have withdrawn investment plans.
The
STA points out that "generally the structure of the CfDs favors large players in
the industry who can shoulder large risks, while the U.K. solar industry is
dominated by new entrants and SMEs that are less able to cope with risk and
uncertainty."
Therefore,
CfD budget and design "favour large, established companies over young,
disruptive solar start-ups," the association adds.
There
is a clear danger, Barwell says, that the CfD policy will remove rather than
increase competition in the energy sector.
Barwell's
argument appears to be in line with that of Jamie Richards, partner and head of
Infrastructure at the U.K.'s Foresight
Group, who said "the new CfD scheme will tend to favor larger scale assets,
where economies of scale will apply."
Foresight's Foresight Solar Fund Limited (FSFL) announced recently it will seek new funds to
acquire new solar PV assets in the U.K.. The fund has only invested in ROC
accredited projects to date.
"Because
the company is the largest solar focused investment
company with gross assets of some £250 million, it will be well-placed to bid
and acquire such assets as they become available," Richards told pv
magazine.
Article From PV
Magazine
Access to more about Landpower Solar Panel
Mounting: Solar
Mounting Systems, Solar
Racking, Solar Hardware, PV
Mounting, Ground mounting
Systems, Solar Mounting System
Manufacturers,Solar
Mounting
没有评论:
发表评论