2014年7月7日星期一

Bangladesh receives $78 million from World Bank for solar home system project

The World Bank's International Development Association (IDA), its soft loan arm, has pledged to back the government of Bangladesh with a loan of $78.4 million intended to add 480,000 solar home systems to the country’s electrification project.
The Rural Electrification and Renewable Energy Development II (RERED II) project is charged with bringing clean and reliable power to thousands of Bangladeshis without grid access to electricity. The solar home system (SHS) project will be implemented as a public-private partnership and will install 7,000 solar PV systems in homes across the country every month – making it the fastest-growing SHS project in the world.
Via the World Bank's support, Bangladesh already has an estimated three million solar home systems installed, which is merely a drop in the ocean when tackling the 58% of the population that do not have access to grid-connected electricity. The government of Bangladesh has targeted the goal of universal access by 2021, but the country’s scattered rural settlements and challenging terrain – much of Bangladesh lies below sea level and is criss-crossed by vast rivers – makes grid electrification a challenging and expensive undertaking.
"Together, the government of Bangladesh and the World Bank is scaling up a program that delivered development results for millions of rural Bangladeshis," said acting head of World Bank Bangladesh, Christine E. Kimes. "This is a proven model that works. Investing in electricity in rural areas empowers both men and women, leading to increased income and growth opportunities, and reducing poverty."
The initial RERED project, approved in 2002, was considered a success, leading to the creation of the RERED II project that has thus far delivered clean energy access to more than 414,000 households, impacting the lives of more than two million people in the process, and all via solar PV energy.
"This repeater project is building up on our efforts to support the government’s vision of providing universal access to electricity," said the Bangladeshi secretary for economic relations, Arastoo Khan. "The benefits of using solar homes systems include increased study time for children, empowerment of women through knowledge from TV viewing, income generation from mobile phone recharging services, as well as contribution to emissions reduction as a result of kerosene replacement."
The terms of the loan from the IDA include a 40 year maturity plan with a ten-year grace period and service charge of just 0.75%. 

 
Article From PV Magazine

2014年7月4日星期五

U.S-China trade war pushes thin film market to 11-month high

Data compiled by analyst firm PVinsights has revealed that spot prices for thin film modules have reached their highest level since the end of July last year as uncertainty over the U.S.-China trade dispute rumbles on.
Thin film modules were spot-priced at 61.2 cents/kW today – a 5.2% increase in the past month and the highest price since July 31 2013. Having plunged to a record low of 58.2 cents/kW on June 4, thin film modules have been steadily rising in price ever since the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) proposed closing a loophole that currently allows Chinese-made modules to circumvent current anti dumping (AD) duties.
Over the same period, spot prices for polysilicon panels – the more commonly used technology and an sector dominated by Chinese suppliers – have fallen by 2.8% to 63.2 cents/kW. Thin film manufacturers such as First Solar from the U.S. and SolarFrontier from Japan are likely to welcome the news, although the increased uncertainty in the market being caused by the ongoing dispute has not curried favor with most solar companies.
"It is very possible that the trade wars have made really low-cost Chinese modules increasingly unusable in many markets," mused Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s solar analyst, Jenny Chase. "That is causing developers to look at thin film."
The DOC is expected to finally determine the level of duties set against polysilicon modules from China and Taiwan by August 18. Preliminary duties have been levied at 19% and 35% respectively, with the International Trade Commission also poised to issue a ruling on the DOC’s actions within 45 days of that date.
Article From PV Magazine

Ten key questions on the future of the UK solar industry

1. Do you share the Solar Trade Association's concerns that the contracts for difference (CfD) scheme could prove unwieldy for the U.K.'s utility scale solar PV industry?
Finlay Colville: CfDs remain an unknown to everyone, with many solar developers being forced into early participation almost by default. The main issue on CfDs is that the solar industry has been given a very short timeline to get its act together, having previously been working on the basis of 2017 transition from ROCs to CfDs. So, it is not so much unwieldy but more 'change' in business models that is impacting the industry right now. Nobody was complaining too much before, but having said that, nobody was having to think too much about what was involved with CfDs.
2. How do you envisage the U.K.'s utility scale (>5 MW) PV sector to look post-April 2015? Has the country already sowed the seeds for an inevitable boom-bust cycle?
The quick conclusion is one of boom-and-bust, especially if we do any comparison with mainland European markets over the past six years. For the >5MW projects, it is likely to be lumpy deployment determined by the outcome of the CfD auctions. However, the wildcard remains the grace period, and how many larger projects willfulfill the final acceptance criteria to build-out. But just one month after April 2015, there is a general election in the U.K. and it is likely that a different group of decision-makers will be in place from May 2015 onwards. Therefore, it is way too early to call a boom-and-bust situation.
And the PV industry is very different today compared to the industry metrics that confronted Spain, Germany and Italy in the past. There is still plenty of finance coming into the industry, the investor community remains largely supportive, and the U.K. has a strong rooftop market with upside that will prevent a bust cycle seen in other countries that relied upon large-scale for deployment.
3. What has the reaction been from overseas investors to the withdrawal of the ROCs next year? Is there the same appetite for/understanding of CfDs, or has the proverbial rug been pulled from beneath their plans? Or, in fact, is it too early to tell just how things will pan out?
For some, it is almost as though nothing has changed, and many are still citing long-term stability and assuming that inward investment alone is sufficient to stimulate demand. Many others, however, have the contacts and relationships established that can make a short-term difference. Some are looking simply at buying sites and maximizing returns based on ROCs. Only a few overseas investors are aware of the speed at which the clock is ticking to get up to speed on the CfD requirements. Bringing in money is one thing – using it effectively is altogether different.
4. The anticipated rush to build before the April deadline must surely be nearing its peak – after August, will we have a clearer idea of how the dust is likely to settle on the U.K.'s utility scale PV sector?
We are actually some way away from it reaching its peak. April 2015 is still quite some time away, and the rush is yet to kick in. The industry is still adapting to the early May shock from DECC. Most developers are seeking to build up portfolios before pressing the ‘build’ button any time now. Grid connection is also a key issue. At the end of the day, the developers that have had the foresight to capture grid-ready approved sites could be the winners. It is likely to be well into Q1’15 before the full picture will be seen.
5. Does the DECC's 'support' of rooftop and industrial solar strike you as genuiue, or an exercise in political posturing?
If DECC had advocated driving development of the large-scale rooftop market in isolation, this would be an easier question to answer. But the promotion of the rooftop market happened to overlap exactly with the negativity towards the large-scale ground-mount segment under ROCs. Therefore, it is harder to understand the commercial rooftop agenda. Most of the aspirations of DECC are valid, but the timescales and policies to stimulate the commercial rooftop segment are very much a work-in-progress and still need incentives or creating financing models to come to fruition.
6. Given the U.K.'s rising proportion of rental tenants versus owner occupiers, and the oft-reported stories of solar panels harming property prices, is there enough appetite within the U.K. for organic growth in the residential sector, even with the FIT?
The residential segment under FITs is perhaps DECC's greatest success in the past couple of years. Once the FITs were put on quarterly capacity-based degression, this segment has been trending gradually upwards at the 80-100MW per quarter level. Residential adoption remains one of DECCs underlying ambitions and, coupled with the sustained interest from the social housing and housing associations, this remains a very strong part of the U.K. market.
7. Developing brownfield sites is rarely a bad idea; how is this sector currently performing in the U.K., and will the DECC's support changes next April actually boost brownfield development?
It is interesting that brownfield development was not ring-fenced within DECC's draft proposal for ROC changes at the start of May. Developing former airstrips and landfill sites has seen strong uptake by the project developers and planners in the past 12 months. The industry has every right to be disappointed that these type of sites – especially the landfill or disused industrial sites – were not granted exemption from DECC’s ROC change proposals.
8. The U.K. solar leasing market has yet to take root in the same way as it has in the U.S. Is Britain's rather dysfunctional housing market to blame for this slow uptake, or are there other factors at play?
One of the things that is often overlooked is that the 'free solar' model has been prevalent in the U.K. for many years. In fact, before the U.S. installers coined the third-party-ownership acronym, free solar had taken off considerably in the U.K. And with the U.K. having one of the strongest and most stable residential markets globally, it is perhaps not a surprise that third-party ownership kicked off so early in the U.K. In fact, free-solar was dominating residential for some time in the U.K., and remains a massive driver.
From a personal standpoint, I must get a cold-call once every two weeks from someone wanting to put solar panels on my rooftop at no upfront cost to me. It is an indication of how strong the push is for this type of installation. In the past year, the leasing model has been extended to small commercial buildings, albeit on a lower scale. But it shows that the financial models for leasing rooftops are getting ever more appealing from an investment perspective.
9. The recent buzz caused by the Solar Roadways technology (chiefly via social media), served to prove that Brits can get excited about solar energy, and STA studies show that solar is a preferred energy source given the choice. Do you sense that attitudes towards solar power in the U.K. are changing for the better?
Well, this is truly a mixed bag! It is clear there is way more public understanding of solar compared to a few years ago, but still a long way to go. But with about 500,000 homeowners having solar PV on their rooftops, the numbers speak volumes for the public adoption. This issue remains one of how much solar the public is prepared to accept on the ground, or nearby their villages. And here, solar is no different to other renewables – or non-renewables – that require build-out. Given the choice over solar, wind farms, fracking or nuclear, then solar is by far the most popular, but this is not the same as saying it is wanted.
10. Next May's general election will likely have a profound impact on the future of the U.K.'s solar sector. In a nutshell, what are your hopes, fears and expectations for this time next year?
It is unlikely – but not impossible – that the existing arrangement of a Conservative/Lib Dem coalition will be the party in power after May 2015. So far, neither David Cameron nor George Osborne has been vocal about renewables – many will say things less diplomatic! So, at the end of the day, it may come down to whether Labour gains a majority or are the dominant partners in another coalition. Until now, the Labour party has generally been reactive in criticizing government policy, rather than being proactive in outlining its own renewables-based roadmap, including solar.
But solar now has such a momentum in the U.K., and it is hard to see how it will not have to form a key part after May 2015. Deployment by then will probably be above 10 GW, and the national grid will be having to deal with daytime spikes from solar output. And as electricity prices continue to rise and solar costs keep coming down, the proposition for elevating solar as a core energy type may end up being too compelling to sideline – regardless of who is in power.
Article From PV Magazine

2014年7月2日星期三

Utility-scale solar meets 6.4% of California's electricity demand in June

Utility-scale solar PV and concentrating solar power (CSP) met 6.4% of California's electricity demand during June 2014, according to an analysis by renewable energy consultant Bernard Chabot.

Chabot also found that PV production peaked at around 4.15 GW mid-day on June 1st, with CSP supplying another 620 MW. This allowed the two sources together to peak at around 19% of the state's electricity demand.

This analysis relies on data from California's grid operator, which does not include behind-the-meter solar PV, including residential and small commercial systems. GTM Research estimates that these represented another 2.617 GW of capacity at the end of the first quarter of 2014.

Electricity generation from CSP was much more even during June than in previous months. Most days the state's CSP plants produced over 5 gigawatt-hours (GWh), and only on June 26th did production drop below 2 GWh over the full day.

Chabot argues that CSP is a more appropriate technology for meeting California's electricity needs, but says that new CSP plants should incorporate storage. 

“Daily solar PV production was very stable in June and much less sensible than the solar thermal  production to the variation of the monthly daily and hourly meteorological and solar irradiation conditions,” notes Chabot.

“This result confirms that future solar thermal power plants should be built only with storage capabilities in order to present at least the same electricity system integration performance than PV plants.” 

Overall, renewable energy including large hydroelectric plants met 28.8% of California's electricity demand during June. This was driven by higher wind and solar output, which has allowed renewables to meet a larger portion of demand despite increased electricity use.

 
Article From PV Magazine

SolarCity, Sunrun to sue Arizona over taxes on third-party solar

SolarCity and Sunrun have filed a lawsuit against the Department of Revenue in the U.S. state of Arizona, challenging the agency's decision to apply property taxes to third-party-owned solar systems.

In April 2013 the Arizona Department of Revenue decided that third-party-owned solar PV is taxable under Arizona law, unlike customer-owned PV systems. According to GTM Research, this will result in US$152 per year in additional taxes for the average system, and will raise the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) US$0.005 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) to US$0.121/kWh.

This is above the state's average residential electricity rate; however most PV system owners in Arizona are on time-of-use plans that charge more for electricity during daytime hours. Because of this, GTM Research says that calculations of LCOE from third-party PV versus electricity rates must be done on a customer-by-customer basis.

The law firm hired by SolarCity and Sunrun is arguing that third-party PV systems should not be subject to property taxes as they produce electricity for on-site consumption. SolarCity also says that imposing the tax will limit Arizona's PV market.

“As with any additional cost, it would reduce Arizonans' ability to turn to an alternative to Arizona Public Service in order to save money on monthly electricity bills, and would reduce rooftop solar's addressable market,” SolarCity Director of Public Affairs Will Craven told pv magazine.

Arizona was the nation's fourth-largest market for residential, commercial and institutional PV in 2013, and as such any changes that happen in the state are significant for the nation's PV market.

Arizona's government has already approved utility charges on customers who participate in the state's net metering program, and GTM Research estimates that property taxes and this charge together raise the LCOE of PV by US$0.01/kWh.
 
Article From PV Magazine

2014年7月1日星期二

EU member states not required to subsidize non-domestic renewable energy production, court rules

The European Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday that European Union member states are not required to subsidize the production of renewable energy in other EU states.
While the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive allows member states to support the domestic production of green energy, the court has made it clear that renewable energy producers are not entitled to receive subsidies from other countries even if they export clean power to those markets.
Finnish company Alands Vindkraft took legal action in 2009 after the Swedish Energy Agency rejected an application by the company for electricity certificates for its wind farm in the Aland archipelago in Finland that was nevertheless connected directly to the Swedish power grid.
Swedish authorities said at the time that only green electricity production installations located in Sweden could be awarded support incentives. 
The Court of Justice ruling came as a surprise in view of the fact that it contradicted the opinion of the court’s advocate general, who had argued that a clause in the EU's renewable energy directive violated treaty rules on the free movement of goods across the 28-member bloc.
However, while the court agreed that subsidy schemes constitute "a restriction of the free movement of goods," it found that the restriction was justified by "the public interest objective of promoting the use of renewable energy sources in order to protect the environment and combat climate change."
"In today's judgment, the Court finds, first of all, that the Swedish green certificates scheme is a support scheme which falls within the scope of the Renewable Energy Directive in so far as it supports the production of green electricity," the court said in a statement. "The Court notes that the directive does not require Member States which have opted for a support scheme to extend that scheme to cover green electricity produced on the territory of another Member State. Accordingly, the Swedish support scheme is compatible with the directive."
The ruling is seen as a blessing for Germany and its recently revamped renewable energy law (EEG), which the government would have had to completely overhaul if the court had ruled in favor of Alands Vindkraft -- a move that would have also resulted in even higher costs for German consumers who are funding renewable energy through a surcharge. Germany's renewable energy law already precludes foreign producers of green electricity from receiving subsidies.  
Article From PV Magazine

UK solar power generation increases 77% in 12 months

The amount of electricity generated by solar power in the U.K. rose by 77% in 2013, according to official figures released today by the coalition government’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).
Renewable energy capacity reached a record 20.8 GW across the country by the end of the first quarter of the year (accounting for 5.2% of the entire energy mix), which represented a 15% increase year-on-year. Two-thirds of that increase was attributed to the addition of solar PV capacity, the majority of which was generated by the large-scale sector – a sector that the government is set to undermine when it withdraws its Renewable Obligation (RO) subsidy scheme for plants of 5 MW and over from April next year.
"These figures show how quickly the U.K. solar industry has developed to make a significant contribution to our energy needs," said Solar Trade Association (STA) chief executive Paul Barwell. "Solar is a secure, homegrown solution to Britain’s twin crises of security of supply and spiraling energy bills."
As solar costs have fallen by an average of 60% in the U.K. since 2011, helping to fuel the current solar boom, the STA has accused the DECC of "pulling the rug out" from under the country's second-cheapest mainstream renewable energy, forcing the British public to spend more on "expensive alternatives".
Big Six investigated
Those "expensive alternatives" could have been artificially inflated in price according to energy market watchdog Ofgem, which is investigating claims that the U.K.'s 'Big Six' energy companies have been profiteering.
The U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) will spend the next 18 months investigating the business practices of British Gas, Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE), EDF, E.ON UK, npower and Scottish Power, to ascertain whether soaring electricity bills in the U.K. are a result of the leading energy companies squeezing undue profit out of their customers.
"Now is the right time to refer the energy market to the CMA for the benefit of customers," said Ofgem chief executive Dermot Nolan. "There is near-unanimous support for a referral and the CMA investigation offers an important opportunity to clear the air. This will help rebuild consumer trust and confidence in the energy market as well as provide the certainty investors have called for."
An Ofgem survey recently found that the majority of energy consumers in the U.K. distrust the Big Six providers, discovering consternation as to how the relationship between the supply businesses and the generation arms of the largest suppliers works, as well as reports of rising profits with no discernible improvement in service, provision or falling bills.
The investigation has been called a "watershed moment" by Richard Lloyd, executive director of the consumer group Which?, labeling the U.K. energy market as "broken" and urging that "no stone is left unturned in establishing the truth behind energy prices."
David Elmes, head of Warwick University’s Global Energy Research Network, remarked that the investigation by Ofgem has come as no surprise. "The question is, who is being investigated?," he asked. "The companies, the regulator, or the government’s policies that have driven recent reform of the energy industry?
"After many years of leaving energy to be run by the markets, the U.K. has recognized a need for a new model of collaboration between industry, the regulator and government so as to meet our needs for affordable, sustainable and secure sources of energy.
"What we need to hope for is that the CMA will step back and consider energy’s role in society and our economy, and whether the past focus on market competition is the right way to tackle today’s challenges."

 
Article From PV Magazine